Have you tried this Meat?👇
This video is not a Fatwa, is the opinion we follow.
This is the opinion of the scholars like Shaykh Abd al-Azeez ibn Baz, Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen, Shaykh al-Albani. If you follow a different opinion, you do you!
“The correct view is that the one who eats the meat of a camel old or young, male or female, cooked or raw has to do wudu. There are several reports which serve as evidence (daleel) for this:
The hadith of Jaabir: the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was asked, Should I do wudu after eating camel meat? He said, Yes. The person said: Should I do wudu after eating mutton? He said, If you wish.
(Narrated by Muslim, 360).
The hadith of al-Baraa: the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was asked about eating camel meat. He said, Do wudu after eating it. He was asked about mutton, and he said, Do not do wudu.
(Narrated by Abu Dawood, 184; al-Tirmidhi, 81. Classed as saheeh by Imaam Ahmad and Ishaaq ibn Raahawayh).
The view of those who do not regard it as obligatory to do wudu after eating camel meat is based on several points, such as:
This ruling is mansookh (abrogated). Their evidence (daleel) is:
The hadith of Jaabir; the last of the two commands from the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was that there was no need to do wudu after eating food that had been touched by fire.
(Narrated by Abu Dawood, 192; al-Nisaai, 185).
But this does not refute the specific meaning of the hadith quoted above from Saheeh Muslim.
Moreover, there is no evidence here of anything being abrogated, because they asked whether they should do wudu after eating mutton, and he said, If you wish.
If this hadith were abrogated, the ruling on mutton would also be abrogated. The fact that he said, If you wish indicates that these ahaadeeth came after the hadith of Jaabir.
In cases of abrogation there must be evidence that what is being abrogated came first chronologically, and there is no