04/11/2019
What do Kendall Jenner, a bacon sandwich and a razor have in common? It’s that they’ve all been part of campaigns accused of ‘woke-washing’, by attempting to co-opt a set of social values for corporate gain.
Whether it is Black Lives Matter, or LGBTQI rights, corporate engagement with charities and social causes is clearly tactical, but does that mean it’s always cynical?
Often, it’s the audeince that decides. If there are big holes in a CSR agenda, modern consumers will revel in poking around. Clearly, campaigns from Pepsi, M & S and Gillette offered too many inherent contradictions to pass the pub test.
Given how easy it is to miss the mark, the question for charities will be: Is pursuing a corporate partnership campaign still worth the risk?
With millions of dollars at stake, most would say yes, but to proceed with caution. The perils of call-out culture mean a ‘take the money and run attitude’ will spell disaster, but a carefully considered partnership could mean corporate dollars swing your way without the added controversy.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/may/23/woke-washing-brands-cashing-in-on-culture-wars-owen-jones
https://www.marketingdive.com/news/the-year-of-woke-washing-how-tone-deaf-activism-risks-eroding-brands/557606/
https://www.adnews.com.au/news/a-bad-dose-of-woke-washing-is-infecting-advertising
From M&S’s LGBT sandwich to Kendall Jenner stopping a riot with a Pepsi can, corporate business is adept at adopting our concerns. But is it all a cynical marketing ploy?