13/09/2024
I’ve been fascinated by the Harris - Trump debate. The way they show up is intriguing, and there’s a lot to learn from it, whether you're standing for national election, or standing up for a pay rise.
Every presentation, interview or conversation has an inner game behind it. Three elements underpin everything:
- Your beliefs about yourself
- Your beliefs about the other side
- Your preparation
*Beliefs about yourself*
I’d suspect Kamala Harris is comfortable in her skills, and in her ability to do this job. From her hand-shake to her bemused, amused expression at Trump’s outbursts, she was in control. By all accounts, Kamala Harris is grounded, intelligent and gently humorous, and that’s an identity she’s happy to live with. It’s a good look for top leadership.
Donald Trump has a strong sense of self, too, but his is rooted in a conviction that he is a victim. When you're focused on how oppressed you are, you rarely have a clear, compelling plan of action. That leads to defensiveness and random attacks (dogs in Springfield), and his bellicose approach. It’s a form of leadership, but it's not a comfortable place to be.
*Beliefs about others*
Kamala Harris bypassed Trump frequently, to speak directly to the viewer, presenting it as a personal conversation. She’s a highly experienced prosecutor, where professional conflicts are not personal, and that showed. Sure, there were damming comments on Trump, but her belief seemed to be that Americans are looking for firm, professional leadership. She’s been criticised for being wishy-washy, and she knew she was being watched for decisiveness and clarity. But with an eye on her existing supporters, she knew that her amused dismissal of her opponent would appeal.
This is where Donald Trump’s victim identity is most powerful. He believes plenty of Americans feel similarly oppressed. Each time he complains about bias, or throws in a dramatic story, he counts on his loyal audience to come with him.
His downfall was his reaction to Harris. I saw a man out of his depth: defensive and bellicose in his reactions to her. I speculate that there’s a mixture of fear and genuine disdain that he couldn’t overcome.
*Preparation*
Preparation is being grounded in your knowledge, and skills. It's also knowing how to manage your own reactions.
Kamala Harris has highly developed verbal and presentational skills, and she knew exactly she wanted to express, and how. She had the traps ready for Trump, and she knew how to deflect attention from her areas of potential weakness.
Trump, however, was rattled. I’m struck by quite how hard he finds it to structure sentences or ideas. He was often responding from anger or defensiveness. It’s almost impossible to think or speak with clarity when you’re under pressure and not in control of your own emotions. And that, too, is a problem with an identity of being the victim.
*What did you think?*
I’m intrigued by what you made of it. Do you agree? What else did you notice?