07/04/2025
Citizen Science and Cryptozoology, data received from listeners during 28 years of wildlife identification broadcasts on ABC North Coast New South Wales Radio station 94.5FM, every Saturday morning at 6:50 am. Over 400 known species were reported by listeners phoning, emailing and texting the station with photos and audio recordings. Several large unclassified mammal species were reported by dozens of farmers, and other rural workers and their descriptions and illustrations were published for the first time in the Australian Zoologist 2017 'Dangerous Ideas in Zoology' edition by the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales.
Citizen Science and Cryptozoology, data received from listeners during 18 years of wildlife talkback on ABC North Coast New South Wales Local Radio. Gary Opit PO Box 383 Brunswick Heads, NSW 2483 Published in the Australian Zoologist, part 4.
Cryptozoology
During decades of gathering data in the field on the natural habitats of the Australian east coast, New Guinea, South-east Asia and the western coast of the United States of America, identifying the flora and fauna, I would always ask local biologists, naturalists, rangers, foresters, farmers and other such people working and dwelling in and adjacent natural habitat for their most interesting wildlife observations. I received and usually recorded many interesting stories of their encounters with both common and rarely seen species. On extremely rare occasions I would encounter stories of unidentifiable animals.
When I started the weekly live-to-air wildlife-talk-back radio broadcasts in 1997 I was expecting to primarily receive enquiries on methods of dealing with wildlife causing problems, house, garden and farm pests, problems with birds flying into windows and birds with annoyingly loud calls. Although these were received and answered, the majority of responding listeners required the identification of a wide array of species. I thought that I would be fortunate to receive calls on distinctive rare species such as spotted-tailed quolls and brush-tailed phascogales. I was therefore surprised to receive inquiries on the identification of animals that were unidentifiable. These reports led me to investigate the specialised field of cryptozoology.
In the abstract of the first article in the first interdisciplinary journal of the International Society of Cryptozoology, published in 1982, Bernard Heuvelmans wrote “Cryptozoology is the science of “hidden” animals”. Heuvelmans coined the term ‘cryptozoology’ in the late 1950’s from the Greek roots kryptos (hidden), zoon (animal), and logos (discourse) and stated that it means “the science of hidden animals.” Heuvelmans writes, “But what are “hidden animals? They are those more generally referred to as “unknowns,” even though they are typically known to local populations – at least sufficiently so that we often indirectly know of their existence, and certain aspects of their appearance and behaviour. It would be better to call them animals “undescribed by science,” at least according to prescribed zoological rules” (Heuvelmans 1982).
The International Society of Cryptozoology’s board of directors at that time included scientists from all over the world. Representing Russia was Dmitri Bayanov of the Darwin Museum, Moscow. Eric Buffetaut and Philippe Janvier worked at the Laboratory of Vertebrate and Human Paleontology of the University of Paris. Nikolai Spassov worked in the Department of Mammals at the National Museum of Natural History at the Bulgarian Academy of Science. Phillip V. Tobias worked in the Department of Anatomy at the University of the Witwatersrand Medical School and represented South Africa. Zhou Guoxing represented China and worked at the Beijing Natural History Museum. Paul LeBlond represented Canada and worked at the Department of Oceanography at the University of British Columbia.
In the United States were Joseph F. Gennaro at the Department of Biology at New York University; Grover S Krantz at the Department of Anthropology at Washington State University, Leigh M. Van Valen at the Department of Biology at the University of Chicago, Forrest G. Wood, at the Biosciences Department of the Naval Ocean Systems Centre of the US Department of the Navy and George R. Zug, worked at the Department of Vertebrate Zoology of the National Museum of Natural History of the Smithsonian Institution.
The International Society of Cryptozoology published its 12 volumes between 1982 and 1996, and published 12 volumes with quarterly numbers of the ISC Newsletter during that time. Under the heading Purpose of the Society, the journals stated “The International Society of Cryptozoology serves as a focal point for the investigation, analysis, publication, and discussion of all matters related to animals of unexpected form or size, or unexpected occurrence in time or space. The Society also serves as a forum for public discussion and education, and for providing reliable information to appropriate authorities” (Greenwell 1982).
The first article to appear on an Australian subject in the journal of the International Society of Cryptozoology was in Volume 3 in 1984, The Orang-utan in England: an Explanation for the Use of Yahoo as a Name for the Australian Hairy Man, by Graham Joyner, PO Box 4253, Kingston ACT 2604, Australia. In the abstract it states, “The Australian hairy man or Yahoo was the subject of speculation throughout most of the 19th Century and beyond. The name Yahoo was often held to be an Aboriginal word, although it was also attributed to Swift. It is suggested that the word Yahoo was used to describe the adult orang-utan when that animal first arrived in England. This appears to be the reason for its use in Australia” (Joyner 1984).
The second article to appear on an Australian subject was in Volume 5 in 1985, The Yahoo, The Yowie, and Reports of Australian Hairy Bipeds, by Colin P. Groves, Department of Anthropology, The Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia. In the abstract it states “Questions surrounding the supposed Yahoo, Yowie, or the supposed wild man of south-eastern Australia are examined in light of what is known of the Australian mammal fauna, the nomenclature of the Wildman, the role of the Wildman in both Aboriginal and Anglo cosmologies, and the claimed existence of the wild man himself. A giant marsupial, such as a wombat, may have survived the megafaunal extinctions, giving rise to the wild man reports” (Groves 1985).
The third article to appear on an Australian subject was in Volume 8 in 1989, Analysis of the Australian “Hairy Man” (Yahoo) Data, by Malcolm Smith, No 7, 23rd Avenue, Brighton, Brisbane, Queensland 4017 Australia. In the abstract it states, “Reports of “hairy men” (Yahoos) in Australia for the period 1871-1912 are examined. The relatively small numbers of eyewitness accounts are characterised by a low level of detail, conflicting descriptions, and a high level of second-hand reportage. The analysis of individual sightings suggests that most can be explained by encounters with isolated Aboriginal males interpreted in the light of a developing settler myth. The evidence for the existence of an unknown primate in the area is very poor” (Smith 1989).
Two articles on an Australian subject appear in Volume 9 in 1990. The first is The Thylacine: A Case for Current Existence on Mainland Australia by Athol M. Douglas, 372 Lesmurdie Road, Lesmurdie, Western Australia, 6076, Australia. In the abstract it states “The thylacine, Thylacinus cynocephalus, also known as the Tasmanian Tiger or Wolf, has been believed extinct on the island of Tasmania since 1936 and on the mainland of Australia for several thousand years. However, sightings of an animal apparently identical to the thylacine have been reported consistently from many parts of the Australian mainland for decades. Investigation of reports from people who have reported sightings of the thylacine in Western Australia are reviewed, and doubt is cast on the carbon 14 dating of a thylacine carcass found in a cave at Mundrabilla Station, Western Australia” (Douglas 1990).
The second article on an Australian subject in Volume 9 is Scientific Discovery and the Place of the Yahoo in Australian Zoological History by Graham C. Joyner, PO Box 4253, Kingston ACT 2604, Australia. In the abstract it states, “Discovery is an extended process in which observation needs to be accompanied by the necessary conceptualisation. The Yahoo (or Australian “gorilla”) may be seen as an unresolved anomaly set against a background involving such anomalies as platypus eggs, marsupial birth, the African gorilla and the Queensland Lungfish” (Joyner 1990).
Previous to the published articles in the journals of The International Society of Cryptozoology, papers, articles and books written by zoologists were published describing unidentifiable mammals in Australia. The Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1871 published a letter from Mr. B. G. Sheridan, police magistrate at Cardwell, to the zoologist Sclater concerning the striped marsupial cat (Sheridan 1871).
The Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, 1872, published an article by Charles Gould, entitled; Large aquatic animals (Gould 1872). Carl Lumholtz M.A., member of the Royal Society of Sciences of Norway, published in 1889 his book “Among Cannibals, an account of four years’ travels in Australia and of camp life with the Aborigines of Queensland” in which he describes the Yarri, an Aboriginal name for carnivorous marsupials including an animal that he believed, from their descriptions, to be a marsupial tiger (Lumholtz 1890).
The Wild Animals of Australasia, published in 1926, was the first comprehensive book to collect in one volume, information concerning all the Australasian mammals. Le Souef and Burrell listed amongst the Dasyuridae a Striped Marsupial Cat stating
“There exists in North Australia a large striped animal, which has aptly been described as “a cat just growing into a tiger”. Though seen on several occasions, we have not yet had a specimen in any of our museums” (Le Souef and Burrell 1926).
Furred Animals of Australia, written by Ellis Troughton, C.M.Z.S., F.R.Z.S., and Curator of Mammals at the Australian Museum from 1919 to 1958 and published in eight editions from 1941 to 1965, also included a section on the Striped Marsupial Cat (Troughton 1941). Australian Museum scientist Gilbert Whitley wrote an article in the Australian Museum Magazine, issue no. 7, 1 March 1940, entitled Mystery Animals of Australia, which included the bunyip (Whitley 1940). Charles Barrett wrote the book The Bunyip and other Mythical Monsters and Legends, (Barrett 1946).
Bernard Heuvelmans wrote, On the Track of Unknown Animals, published in French in 1955 and in English in 1962, which contains a chapter on Australia entitled, The Incredible Australian Bunyips, with information on and an illustration of, the Striped Marsupial Cat (Heuvelmans 1962). In 1962 the Australian Journal of Zoology published the study Mammals of Innisfail by Dr J L Harrison, which included a description of the Striped Marsupial Cat, observed crossing a road at night near Palmerton (Harrison 1962).
The Queensland National Parks and Wildlife Service published an article on the Striped Marsupial Cat in the Wet Tropics Newspaper 1998 describing James Cook University zoological researcher Scott Burnett studying spotted-tailed quolls on the Atherton Tablelands during the 1990s. He received information from elderly local tin miners and timber cutters concerning a cat-like animal the size of a dingo, sandy coloured, with a rounded head and small ears near rocky areas in rainforest (Woodward 1998).
All of these reported sightings are soft evidence (sensu Swords 1991). The difficulty of validation of such observations has been borne out by the recent evaluation of night parrot (Pezoporus occidentalis) sightings by the Rarities Committee of Birdlife Australia (Davis & Metcalf 2008).
In the 2014 published book The Tasmanian Tiger: Extinct or Extant? Dr Robert Paddle evaluates this situation when he writes “....sightings of a supposedly extinct animal, in themselves, cannot be considered as evidence for the continued existence of that species. Only evidence provided that is capable of scientific analysis, testing and experimentation can overturn a designation of extinction” (Paddle 2014 p 146).
“...it is also completely appropriate (and logical) for a scientist to take an interest in contemporary sightings of the thylacine. This is not a case of cognitive dissonance, but merely a reflection upon scientific methodology. Post 1936, claimed instances of Thylacine encounters actually involve a testing or potential disproof of the hypothesis of extinction, and the core attempt to disprove a scientific idea, equation or hypothesis lies at the very heart of scientific endeavour” (Paddle 2014 p 149).
“Records of thylacines post 1936 are undoubtedly of interest – to the scientist as well as the lay researcher. While they do not amount to evidence for the continued existence of the species – once again, nothing but a body will change that designation – nevertheless, should that evidence be forthcoming, then the information obtained from recent sightings will be seen to possess valuable distributional and behavioural data of relevance to the continued welfare of the species.....The reporting of modern Thylacine sightings is to be encouraged; and detailed records made of such incidents should be forwarded to either professional organisations, such as the Australian Rare Fauna Research Association, with its long history of existence and record keeping, and the social, legal and scientific expertise of its members; or to significant private individuals, such as Col Bailey, with a demonstrable public and private history in the handling of this information ” (Paddle 2014 p 155).
Chad Arment codified cryptozoological thinking in his book Cryptozoology: Science and Speculation, describing it as a “targeted search methodology for zoological discovery”. The researcher compares descriptions of “ethnoknowns” from written and oral tradition with known taxa to search for morphological and behavioural resemblances along with geographical locations to identify a possible match. A targeted search of the possible habitat may then be undertaken using a number of techniques (Arment 2004).