23/01/2024
Alcalde vs Chairman system
“ THE ABOLISHMENT OF THE ALCALDE SYSTEM IN FAVOR OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL WAS A WAY OF CONTROLLING US ,DIVIDING US , TO MOVE VOTES FOR POLITICAL PARTIES AND NOT TO REPRESENT THE VILLAGE ... “ - Belize Yucatec Maya
Belize and the Alcalde System Belize, formerly called British Honduras, is part of the Maya region. The Spanish never occupied Belize and the British eventually took possession making it the only English speaking country in Central America. British buccaneers settled in the mouth of the Belize River from where they could easily pirate Spanish ships transporting logwood. Eventually in 1667 when piracy was suppressed they themselves began to cut logwood close to the mouth of the Belize River. This not only meant a more permanent settlement but the importation of African slaves. As the buccaneers moved up-stream and shifted their attention to the extraction of mahogany, they came into greater contact with the Maya. What form of Maya leadership the British encountered in Belize is not recorded, but it is likely similar to the batab. By the 1850s, there is evidence that the British encountered the Alcalde system in their efforts to incorporate the Maya and bring them under colonial control. In 1858 Superintendent Seymour proposed a bill that aimed “to legalize and define the position of Alcalde” which he explained his predecessors had allowed “Yucatec and Indian villages” to elect and present to them for appointment to the position. He proposed to make them something of a police officer, justice of the peace, and magistrate and to have them be nominated by the communities but appointed by the superintendent who would also have the power of suspension. When the legislation was passed, it did not even mention the point that the people would nominate their Alcaldes (Bolland 1988). Instead, the bill proposed that the Alcalde was to be appointed by the superintendent from individuals he judged to be adequate, and the Alcalde in turn was to appoint village police subject to the approval of the superintendent. In the process of legalizing and defining the Alcalde, the colonial administration, as Bolland notes, was imposing on it “British authority and legal concepts” (Bolland 1988, p. 136) and shifting the source of authority from the community to the colonial administration. Despite Seymour’s bill, the reality was that the Maya Alcaldes seem to have continued to function as they had. In the 1880s, colonial Secretary Henry Fowler acknowledged the failure of previous policy noting that the Indians were scattered and that “no control was really exercised over them” (Henry Fowler (1887) as quoted in Bolland 1988, p. 146). Fowler proposed a renewal of the Alcalde system such that the Maya can be brought under “legitimate influence and control... and be converted from passive and indifferent subjects into loyal and willing settlers” (ibid.). According to Bolland, Fowler makes his intentions clear stating that this is “to exact from them a strict adherence to the legal form of the colony” and “to draw 6 F. Penados them from their old traditions, and little by little to teach them our more exact methods of justice.” (ibid.). That Henry Fowler was still attempting to transform the Alcalde system in the late 1800s in order to bring the Maya more effectively under British rule suggest that despite British efforts, the Maya in Belize were about to enter the twentieth century exercising a fair degree of autonomy.
The Village Councils
The Alcalde system came under attack again in the 1940s with the introduction of the Village Council which is today regulated by the Village Council's Act (Government of Belize 2000b). The institution of village councils was first introduced by the colonial administration in the late 1940s (Moberg 1992) but established in different villages at different times. It was proposed as a mechanism that would allow community development through self-help – the community would provide labor and the government the financial resources. The introduction of village councils coincided with the beginning of the independence movement in Belize and the birth of political parties. Moberg (1992) notes that it also coincided with what was happening in other areas of the British Empire emanating from the belief that the existing forms of traditional governance systems were autocratic and incompatible with democratic principles. He suggests “the intent, if not the stated goal, of such alternatives was to undercut established local authorities, creating new village leaders who derived their authority from electoral mandate” (Moberg 1992, p. 13). He concludes that the Village Council system resulted in the destruction of consensual politics and the demise of the Alcalde system, except those in the Toledo district of Belize. The example of Succotz, a Yucatec Maya village in the Cayo District where the Alcalde system had been in existence since the 1800s, illustrates how this change from alcades to village council occurred. The village council was introduced to Succotz in the 1960s. For a very short period, the Alcalde system co-existed with the Village council but was quickly abolished completely. How the abolishment of the Alcalde system happened is not clear, but as far as local leaders from around that time recall, it was just something decided by the government with no consultation with the community. The village chairman of 1965 recalls that party politicians (the Minister of Rural Development and area representative at the time) told them that they did not need the Alcalde anymore, since they could manage their own communities themselves. He also recalls the slogan that when the Peoples United Party won the struggle for independence, there would be no need to do fajinas. (Fajina is a community collective form of work where all men aged 18 and over maintain village commons.) He recalls that some local politicians went further and suggested villagers ask for payment if they were asked to contribute community work. The results of the introduction of the Village Council and the abolishment of the Alcalde system resulted not only in the destruction of consensual politics, as Moberg argues. It also meant the destruction of collective forms of work to maintain the commons, the loss self-reliance in addressing community works, and the Indigenous Governance and Education in Belize: Lessons from the Maya Land... 7 introduction of a dependency on the state. Succotz village leaders of the 1960s, for example, observe that the village council quickly became more a representative of the political parties and not the community. It became a mechanism for mobilizing votes and increased any divisiveness that already may have existed. Today these leaders lament the loss of community, autonomy, and self-reliance.
Indigenous Governance and Education in Belize: Lessons from the Maya Land Rights Struggle and Indigenous Education Initiatives Filiberto Penados
Pictures of the last Maya Yucatec alcaldes in Belize .