
19/03/2025
Brutalism!
Loved by architects, disliked by almost everybody else.
The Oscar-winning blockbuster "The Brutalist" have caused plenty of engaged discussions with our tour guests about the Modernist architectural heritage.
Looking into a future, where the only right thing to do is to stop demolitions and avoif building from scratch whenever possible, old brutalist buildings with their bad rap need to be perceived as part of the future and a canvas for transformation.
We have two examples (almost) around the corner of our shop that show how it can be done:
KB 32, placed close to the harbourfront, has long been viewed as one of the ugliest structures of Copenhagen. It was originally designed in 1967 by the architect Ole Hagen, but in 2017 it underwent a comprehensive renovation by Vilhelm Lauritzen Architects. Key brutalist elements are preserved such as the concrete structure, expansive windows, and raw industrial aesthetic while introducing more daylight in the new facade, making the overall appearance more accommodating.
This eye-opening transformation turned KB 32 into a stylish, functional office space that even won the 'Copenhagen's Best Architecture' award in 2022.
Another example is the so-called “Desert Fortress”, designed by architect P***e Suenson in the 1960s. Originally it was a headquarters for the shipyard Burmeister and Wains and later used as an office building by a bank. The building has now, in 2021, been transformed by Henning Larsen Architects into a hotel that also meets its surroundings in a much more welcoming way.
We will have to adapt to a future with a new aesthetic based on the transformation of unattractive buildings. Transformation may be difficult and expensive, and the result might end up looking different from what is often considered "nice" in the first place, but it is still the right thing to do. The most sustainable building is always a building that already exists.
The more examples we see of transformations with an attentive balance between preservation and innovation, the easier it gets to acknowledge the qualities and potentials of ‘brutal’ buildings.