08/01/2022
Home Office: Scientific methods to determine the age of asylum seekers
The number of asylum seekers coming into the UK is rapidly increasing, but an even bigger statistic are those than come to the UK claiming to be younger than they actually are. The Home Office has deemed this as a ‘significant issue’.
These asylum seekers who claim to be younger are able to access children’s services, care services and schools. From September 2020 until September 2021, the number of resolved age dispute cases was 1,696 where an asylum seeker was in fact older than they had reported when they came into the country. The Home Office has reported that two thirds of individuals who claim they are minors, are in fact over the age of 18. Which poses a significant risk to children and young adults who are already in schools and care.
In recent news, the Home Secretary said that they are attempting to change UK laws to introduce new scientific methods to assess the age of the asylum seeker before they are given access to children’s services. Many European countries use x-rays, CT scans and MRI imaging to view key parts of the body in order to ascertain the age of an individual. The UK are attempting to provide more support and resources to local councils in order to implement these scientific methods, which will look at body parts such as teeth and bones to help assess the true age of an asylum seeker.
In addition, the new laws are hoping to deter asylum seekers from lying about their age, as if they refuse to submit to these checks, then this could damage their credibility when assessing their asylum claim.
However, these scientific methods have been heavily criticised for being subjective, incurring expensive legal challenges, and issues around incorrect assessments could be disastrous. Priti Patel’s plan has been named as “flawed and dangerous” and that they are “inappropriate and unethical”. There is however much debate over whether these claims are fair, and many people believe that the risks that are currently posed by incorrect age assessments are substantial.