29/09/2020
The developers should rebuild the home brick by brick!
Moving away from 1798 for this afternoon, it is not right to remain silent on this morning’s shocking story about the demolition of the residence that belonged to The O’Rahilly, a 1916 leader who died from his wounds whilst leading a charge on Dublin’s Moore Street. The house had received much focus recently and its protection from Dublin City Council was secured several weeks ago. This house was displayed in the 1907 World Fair as an example of Irish architectural development. Michael Collins, Cathal Brugha and Madame Markievicz graced it with many visits and was used as a safe house. Some of the earliest business of our national government, An Dáil Éireann, was carried out in this house when it was declared illegal by Westminster. All this seems irrelevant in Ireland now. Maybe the new apartments will receive a token gesture by being titled “O’Rahilly Apartments” or receive a state sponsored plaque to inform us of what stood there originally. Only then of course will its importance be respected. We have lost Robert Emmet’s house, Frescati, Wolfe Tone’s House, Oliver Bond’s House, Clanwilliam House, most of Jacob’s Mills and many more, all to developments not worthy of admiring.
What is most disturbing is the fact that the developers ordered for this house to be illegally demolished this morning before the designated 7am start of work rule. It was literally knocked in darkness. As of now, it still remains to be reported on the national media. There is a culture in Ireland that has allowed buildings of importance to be knocked to make way for apartments, office space, carparks or the sea of hotels. In every city and town across Ireland, buildings, centuries old, are being allowed to deteriorate into an unsafe state, thus legitimising the need for their demolition and sanitising any public anger. Progression and development should not see our heritage victimised. Instead of demolishing, let’s rejuvenate. Ireland drastically needs law reform regarding planning and our heritage. This year alone, we have faced several instances of our 1798 heritage being harassed by development. Thankfully they were quashed, however, this has failed. What will be next I ask you?
PLEASE SHARE